The Supposed 7 Billionth Citizen of the World

"LandepNews"

The Supposed 7 Billionth Citizen of the World

A mommy gave birth to a child in the Philippines on Monday, and while the birth of a child must be a celebration of life every time, she had to endure the comments reported by the international media, which were announcing the Apocalypse because the 7 billionth human being was born. All day long the experts and the journalists attempted to save the planet from its imminent collapse, reviving theories that were condemned in international trials decades ago, and advancing others that should be condemned by the International Criminal Court in The Hagues.
The fear this little child brought with him to the entire world is rooted in a theory that has never been proven right beyond any reasonable doubt – the idea that the increase of the population could cause a planetary tragedy as more and more people would have to share less and less natural resources.
The discussion was until yesterday strictly hypothetical. On Monday, however, so called measures have been brought int question in order to avert this “catastrophe.” The estimations that made possible the ascribing of the blame on that poor child from the Philippines say that at the rate it is growing, the population could reach ten billion in a few decades. Consequently, something must be done to stop this tragedy from happening. In other words, something must be done to prevent new human beings from being born.
Thomas Robert Malthus, the English philosopher who spoke about this problems a few centuries ago, had no constraints from proclaiming that if the mild measures didn’t work, the hard way must be implemented.
By hard measures he meant wars and diseases, and natural catastrophes, in other words, killing the people that are extra. Malthus failed to say exactly which people were to be sacrificed but it is not difficult to infer from the mentality of the century whom did he have in mind.
Times have changed, and those who want their existence secured on the planet have thought of other means to control the growth of the population. One of them was wondering if the entire planet could adopt the Chinese policy of “one-child-per-family.” The posting was showing how the Chinese managed to cut down their population growth by 200 million.
While acknowledging without any problem that the Chinese made sure 200 million of their people weren’t even born, opinions were expressed that it may not be a good idea, because no one would accept how many children to have.
The prospect of a state telling you how many children to have is more than even the most pessimistic writers could have imagined in their dystopias. And since such an idea could not be embraced by the population of the planet, and for a good reason, in the end the caretakers of the planet’s development proposed that it was best to have the women “empowered” to such a point that would make it possible to convince them not to want too many children.
An article in a very serious newspaper was suggesting that the women should be told in school and in meetings with psychologists and control planners not to desire too many children. If they did not understand, they should be “infected” with the desire to make a career and place it far above the family matters.

UN Population Division Representation of the Population Growth

If a woman is caught up in a career, the desire to have children is at low rate, and it may rise when the career is accomplished. By then the woman would be old enough not to able to sustain more than one child. The tragedy is already happening in the Western European countries, whose population is going extinct, and is expected to be extinct in some decades.
The fault of this devious theory is that the women that give birth to many children live in countries where career prospects are non-existent, so this manipulation cannot work.
In other words, the think-tankers want to “empower” the women of the planet to renounce the only thing that actually defines them and makes them feel complete: their motherhood. In order to avert the peril of having to share the world’s resources with more people, the decision makers at an international level are willing to turn women into an instrument of destruction of the human race.
Furthermore, they are willing to do that by using school as a tool. School, which in every country was revered as a place of education and betterment, is to become a place that teaches a very heinous form of genocide. All that in the name of the greater good. How cool can that be?
If the population growth is not tackled with honesty and humanity, the planet can face the danger of having the birth of children listed as a crime to be punished. If that happens, the entire human race would have collapsed into the deepest and darkest hell imaginable.
There is cause to believe that the announcement of the birth of the 7 billionth citizen is not reflecting a reality but rather someone’s desire in control at the highest levels to make people be afraid, to make them fear what is most natural in the world.
There are two important shortcomings in the issuances on the matter of the UN agencies: 1. UN agencies have no way of knowing for a fact when the seven billionth was born; 2. UN agencies have no way of knowing how many natural resources the planet has.
First, there is no possibility to know for a fact how many people are in the world. The UN estimate that on Monday the 7 billionth was born is based on some mathematic probability calculation.
The United Nations Population Division estimates that the world population is increasing by 200,000 a day. That is the basis of the entire estimation.
One cannot possibly believe that the UN actually has a record of exactly how many people are in the world. And there are reasons to think so. A few years ago, the anthropologists discovered a group of people they had no knowledge about. Where were these people in the UN Population Division’s numbers? How many people are there in the world no one knows about?
There are countries in Europe that are unable to have an accurate national census. The situation gets worse in parts of the world that are decades behind the European standard, and there are territories where the live and death balance can change at every minute. How is it possible to keep a track on them so that one can say for sure that this person is the seven billionth human being in the world?
For that child to actually have been the seven billionth human being alive, the planet should have stood perfectly still, and no other birth or death should have occurred at the same time. Or that is impossible to count in real time.
Unless the UN Population Division has other means of keeping track of the population that would make possible to count every single living soul on Earth, which would appear on some sort of computed calculus and would disappear from the grid as soon as they were no longer alive.
It is conceivable that such technique exist in Western Europe, in eastern Asia or in America, because these are technologically advanced nations, but do they exist in other parts of the world?

British Counter of World Population

So, it is safe to say that the announcement on Monday is based on a mathematic projection more than on an actual heads count. Mathematics can not tell anyone to be born or lay down and die.
Another reason why the seven billionth hysteria is not to be taken seriously is that there is no accurate measurement of the natural resources. They are supposed the same way the population is being supposed, that is by means of statistics.
A few decades ago, the Club of Rome made a prediction related to the fact that the oil resources would be depleted. Then they had to offer a revised version of the reality, a version that would be closer to the truth.
So, if no one knows exactly how many natural resources are on the planet, how can one say that they would be depleted now or then? And more importantly, how can one make decisions related to the birth or death of human children based on some reports that lack accuracy?
There is another aspect which has more bearing with the spiritual view of life. In every religion in the world, the care of the world is entrusted to God (whatever his name is in different religions). Except for the disbelievers and the agnostics, almost all the people in the world believe that God is he who takes care of the world and since God is the one who benedicts each woman to become a mother, it is fair to say that he is the one to make sure every one of his seven billion children will have a life of their own in this world.
Although a scientist enthusiast would regard these inferences as backward mysticism, they are true, and from that perspective, the UN or any other organization has no legitimacy in proclaiming itself the caretaker of the world, and the failure to resolve the main problems of the planet, not to mention the solutions that are closer to neo-Nazi propaganda than to a safe and should policy, show that abundantly.
If that is not enough to show that the idea of taking care of the world problems is interfering with the natural order of things God imposed in the world, one should consider that the idea of convincing women to have one child will be embraced at most by godless populations in the Western Europe or Northern America, which live in the religion of the life quality.
No Muslim woman will accept this proposition, no Christian woman in Latin America will accept this, no Hindu woman in India. Since these are the places where most children are born, the problem will not be solved and the caretaking proposals will only lead to the extinction of the population in Europe and northern America. And that will not be enough to save the problem either.
Believer or disbeliever, the matter of sharing resources can only be solved by limiting greed, not by limiting the miracle of life from occurring.
A state that is not able to take care of its people and has to prevent them from being born is a failure and should be reconstructed from scratch, be that China, the United States or the United Nations.
The limitation of greed could ensure that the people have resources to live no matter how many they are on earth. It is said that the entire resources of the planet are being concentrated into the hands of some ten percent of the population.
There are people who speculate that the entire overpopulation propaganda is meant to make sure that the resources don’t get split to too many people. The problem is in the end a moral one.
The human being as we know it today is devouring everything, from natural resources to its own future. For what are children other then our future?
If mankind wishes to avoid extinction as a species, the key is not “empowering” women to despise children but educating people not to let themselves consumed by the desire to consume without any restraint.

Thank's for link: